Heartstopper Forever
Jul. 19th, 2026 05:32 pmApart from that, it was good, of course. Alice Oseman is a great writer. I especially liked Elle's scene about the current state of trans rights in the UK.































Sharing a Breath by Gail MatelsonV.L. Bovalino, The Second Death of Locke (2025)(The Hand and the Heart #1) They’re soldiers! They’re magical soldiers magically tethered together (the magic system requires complementary “wells” and “mages”) and childhood best friends and utterly devoted to each other and dancing back and forth over that “romantic” line. Plenty of people are unimpressed by this dynamic: “Friends to lovers? More like LOVESICK to lovers.” I am quoting an actual review, it made me guffaw. If this is you, please give it a pass. Me though? It lit up every pleasure center in my brain. “He would die for me but would he want me if not for the web of obligations that lies between us” hits me right in the bullseye of my id. Inject that melancholy yearning directly into my veins. Another scathing review: “This author reheated Gideon and Harrow’s nachos and made it het for some inexplicable reason?” Lol. I don’t endorse the sentiment but I think the larger point stands—unlike The Locked Tomb this is not a dense story. I would say it has the density of a sugared wafer. I was skimming so fast it felt like YA.
What soured it for me was not anything about the worldbuilding, which was uninspired but fine. None of the supporting cast were memorable but again: it was fine. It absolutely did need to be a fantasy book, insofar as their relationship is rooted in their roles as magic-user and magic-supplier. But in this kind of partnership you have to pick one partner to be The Chosen One and the other to be The Sacrifice, you get me? The Gideon/Harrow analogy is not perfect but not entirely off-base. You can’t halfway through the book make them switch roles, because it’ll give your reader whiplash. It’s me, I have rope burn from this story.
Jo Walton and Ada Palmer, Trace Elements: Conversations on the Project of Science Fiction and Fantasy (2026) My two faves wrote a book and it gave me a raft of new tools to talk about my favorite hobby, genre fiction. Imagine if you were an amateur photographer or guitarist or some hobby that requires a heavy upfront investment in equipment. Imagine for Christmas you got a top-of-the-line piece of equipment that was way out of your budget. Thank you for this gift, Ada and Jo, and your combined decades of insight into the field. Very few of the ideas herein were entirely new-to-me, given that I already get half my fiction recommendations from Jo’s Reactor column and I listen to every podcast Ada guests on. I’m familiar with all their hobbyhorses: I know about “tachyon drive guy” and I know about the moral logic of Japanese ghost stories. There are some real galaxy-brain metaphors on offer, like “SFF is like mac ’n cheese” and “SFF is like stringing beads on a necklace.” I think the most surprising takeaway for me was the second half of the book, the more “personal” half. Here is where they stealthily drop a whole chapter on chronic pain & disability in the middle of a SFF litcrit book—and it works beautifully. These aren’t personal essays in the mold of a New Yorker or Atlanticpiece, whose structure is 1) impeccable and 2) predictable…like, almost irrespective of the subject matter you kind of already know the shape of it. These essays are more numinous but no less powerful, and I actually yelped aloud when Jo pinpointed the exact reason I never warmed to The Princess Bride. There’s a scene where Ada and Jo are sharing a train car with some Japanese tourists and Ada introduces Jo as her sempai, a designation that befits her because Jo is not only older than Ada in writing years but has been grappling with disability for way longer. Thanks for being born, Jo and Ada.
Veronica Roth, Seek the Traitor’s Son (2026) I was seeking a quick hit of dopamine and alas Roth’s id is juuuuust enough misaligned with mine that I did not get it. The extent of the woobifcation of the male lead was more than I could stomach. I thought this was going to be a fall-for-your-bodyguard setup and instead, no sooner has he sworn his Magical Bodyguard Vow than he gets abducted by the antagonist. Alrighty then our political rival is also our romantic rival. There’s a lot in here about exile and expatriation, heritage and assimilation, that’s underbaked because what Roth is actually interested in is getting to the steamy sex scene. Which was hot and I enjoyed it! The person I wanted to see more of, however, was Elegy’s half-sister, who is the hereditary ruler of their little underdog nation and who is painted as paranoid and power-hungry and I’m like…no actually, our girl Elegy actually is impulsive and has no sense of responsibility! She actually doesn’t take her role as Chosen One seriously! If I was in charge of her I too would try to lock her up.
Douglas Stone and Sheila Heen, Thanks For the Feedback: The science and art of receiving feedback well (2014) Running a small business is putting a ton of extra stress on my relationship with my husband. At one point I was kvetching about it in the groupchat and my friend who is a software engineer mentioned this book that her team had read together. It’s a business book headlined by two Harvard Law lecturers who consult for Citigroup, Unilever, etc… and it is the single most useful thing I’ve picked up since I bought this mini spatula to scrape my empty jars with. It’s populated with plenty of conversation scripts (so handy!) and I would say the split between professional/personal scenarios is 60/40, so it was plenty relevant to me, a person who’s never worked a white-collar job. And lo, me and my husband never had a fight again! Jk but it gave me a raft of new tools to dissect recurring problems (“why do we keep having the same fight??”). Sounds pretty 101 but actually it helps if two people are on the same page re: the purpose of a conversation lol. So much of this book is reminding you to check in with your conversational partner to see if they’re picking up what you’re putting down, ie. can we separate feedback that is pat-on-the-back appreciation versus this-is-how-you-can-improve coaching? Can we stick to one topic per conversation instead of derailing the other person’s feedback with another, unrelated topic? Can we recognize that our brains encode not data but stories, and look for the underlying facts that inform the other person’s interpretations instead of dismissing them as “that’s wrong” out of hand? There is a hefty helping of neurobiology + psychology in here, and so many precision-targeted examples. Can’t recommend it enough.
